Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> No, I intentionally didn't back-patch that. The only benefit of the
>> change is throwing a useful error message for questionable syntax.
> then, maybe a fix in the docs of back branches?
What's to fix? The documentation already makes it quite clear where
you're supposed to put the label. I think documenting the code's
actual behavior could only confuse people.
regards, tom lane
