Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Date
Msg-id 1386517503.31519.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 16:00 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > 32-bit buildfarm members are having problems with this patch.
> 
> This should fix that problem. Thanks.

This is incidentally the same problem that was reported here about
another pg_stat_statements patch:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/BF2827DCCE55594C8D7A8F7FFD3AB7713DDAC54F@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com

Can we make this more robust so that we don't accidentally keep breaking
32-bit systems?  Maybe a static assert?





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER FREEZE