On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 16:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
> wrote:
> > Now for the linestyles. I can see how some of them are attractive,
> but
> > several of them have poor aesthetics, I think. I don't see a reason
> to
> > accept 7 new styles just for fun. If I had to choose, I'd consider
> > -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.
>
> I'm confused why we need ANY of these.
I'm not actually in favor of adding any of these. I was just trying to
say that any but the ones I mentioned I don't consider acceptable at
all.
