Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Leonardo Francalanci
Subject Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Date
Msg-id 1383673960881-5777056.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes wrote
> Some experiments I did a few years ago showed that applying sorts to the
> data to be inserted could be helpful even when the sort batch size was as
> small as one tuple per 5 pages of existing index.  Maybe even less.

Cool!!! Do you have any idea/hint on how I could try and replicate that?
Do you remember how you did it?




--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Fast-insertion-indexes-why-no-developments-tp5776227p5777056.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Leonardo Francalanci
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments