Re: warning message in standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: warning message in standby
Date
Msg-id 13823.1276529923@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: warning message in standby  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If a message is being issued in a non-user-connected session, there
>> is basically not a lot of point in WARNING or below. �It should either
>> be LOG, or ERROR/FATAL/PANIC (which are probably all about the same
>> thing in the startup process...)

> I think Simon's point here is the same as mine - LOG isn't too high -
> it's too low.

If he wants to throw ERROR, that's fine with me.  If your point is that
you think WARNING is more severe than LOG, the answer is that you need
to readjust your thinking.  It's not.  See the sort order for
log_min_messages values.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: warning message in standby
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: warning message in standby