Re: 8.2 features status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From andrew@dunslane.net
Subject Re: 8.2 features status
Date
Msg-id 1380.24.211.165.134.1154828499.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 features status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.2 features status
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
>> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:19:54AM -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
>>> FTI is a biggie in my mind.  I know it ain't happening for 8.2, but is
>>> the general plan to integrate TSearch2 directly into the backend?
>
>> When the Tsearch developers say so I think.
>
> Yeah, that's my take too.  Oleg and Teodor obviously feel it's not "done"
> yet, and ISTM leaving it in contrib gives them more flexibility in a
> couple of ways:
> * they can make user-visible API changes without people getting as upset
>   as if they were changing core features;
> * because it is a removable contrib module, they can (and do) offer
>   back-ports of newer versions to existing PG release branches.
>
> I think some descendant of tsearch2 will eventually be in core, but
> we'll wait till we're pretty certain it's feature-stable.
>


My impression from this post
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-07/msg00556.php was that
moving it into core should be doable for 8.3. I hope I didn't
misunderstand.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Corner case in xlog stuff: what happens exactly at a seg boundary?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade (was: 8.2 features status)