Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Johnston
Subject Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT
Date
Msg-id 1378865596238-5770394.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT
List pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch-2 wrote
> The errfinish() pertaining to that WARNING issues CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(),
> and
> the query cancel pending since before the SIGQUIT arrived then takes
> effect.
> This is less bad on 9.4, because the postmaster will SIGKILL the backend
> after
> 5s.  On older releases, the backend persists indefinitely.

9.4 == head or is this is typo?

Your feelings on how far to back-patch?

David J.



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Pending-query-cancel-defeats-SIGQUIT-tp5770390p5770394.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Broken link in contrib/fuzzystrmatch/dmetaphone.c
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT