Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?
Date
Msg-id 13781.1455840922@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-docs
Tree view 
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
> Why would dead pages not get traversed by scans?

Because they've been removed from the right-link/left-link chains.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: effective_io_concurrency and SSDs