Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?
Date
Msg-id 1376923892.9929.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:

>> I think "promote" file should trigger the fast promotion, and
>> the filename to trigger the slow mode should be called
>> "fallback_promote" or "safe_promote" or something like that.
>> There wasn't any good reason to change the filename primarily
>> used. It might even break people's scripts for no good reason,
>> if people are creating the $PGDATA/promote file themselves
>> without using pg_ctl.
>
> +1.

+1  Changing it has risk with no associated benefit that I can see.
 
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix Windows socket error checking for MinGW
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix Windows socket error checking for MinGW