Re: SET prepared statement - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Oliver Kohll
Subject Re: SET prepared statement
Date
Msg-id 1374FD47-BDE2-4159-B586-55C8A15A996D@agilechilli.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET prepared statement  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general

On 13 Apr 2016, at 16:48, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Oliver Kohll <oliver@agilechilli.com> wrote:
Hello,

We currently use prepared statements for most of the work an app does, as an SQL injection protection and for other reasons.

There's one statement which can't be prepared:

SET LOCAL myprefix.mysetting = 'my setting value';

Ideally, I'd like to be able to do

PREPARE test(text) as SET LOCAL myprefix.mysetting = $1;

but this isn't supported (currently on PG 9.3)

I suspect the answer is 'no' but no harm in asking if it's likely to be considered in future. I can't see it here: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo


​Given that you can simply use the "set_config(...)" function I'd say that this command will have not particular in the decision work on improving this limitation in the system.


​David J.​

Ah excellent, I should have seen that, thanks.

Oliver

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sign function with INTERVAL?
Next
From: "drum.lucas@gmail.com"
Date:
Subject: I/O - Increase RAM