Re: What happened with bug #2527? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: What happened with bug #2527?
Date
Msg-id 13741.1250350346@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to What happened with bug #2527?  ("Sam's Lists" <samslists@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
"Sam's Lists" <samslists@gmail.com> writes:
> I seem to be being bitten by the same bug as #2527 which was reported three
> years ago.

> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-07/msg00056.php

> I can't find any record of it having been addressed.

I don't think it's really a bug --- or at least, if it's a bug, the bug
is that it doesn't throw error on both of those inputs.  See the lexeme
quoting rules at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/datatype-textsearch.html
which these examples are clearly violating.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Sam's Lists"
Date:
Subject: What happened with bug #2527?
Next
From: "durfenlee"
Date:
Subject: BUG #4987: registered in pg_type by a wrong table name