Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Date
Msg-id 13737.1481935186@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 12/16/16 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> If we were going to do anything about this,
>> my vote would be to remove sql_inheritance.

> Go for it.

> Let's also remove the table* syntax then.

Meh --- that might break existing queries, to what purpose?

We certainly shouldn't remove query syntax without a deprecation period.
I'm less concerned about that for GUCs.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API