Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
Date
Msg-id 1372615918.19747.22.camel@jdavis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 11:38 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Since Greg seems to be busy, what needs to be done to test this?

As I understand it, he was mainly asking if posix_fallocate works at
all. I tried to address that question with a simple test, which behaves
as I expected it to:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1372615313.19747.13.camel@jdavis

Unless something surprising comes up, or someone thinks and objection
has been missed, I am going to commit this soon.

(Of course, to avoid your wrath, I'll get rid of the GUC which was added
for testing.)

Regards,Jeff Davis





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC