Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> The original version of the patch commandeered an extra bit for tuple
>> length. If you back off INDEX_SIZE_MASK to 1FFF, and document bit
>> 13 as unused/reserved, then it's just a cleanup.
> OK, we are both catching up now on the email. Should I put it in
> current? Seems like cosmetic cleanup. Of course, even if you say yes,
> I have to wait 24 hours.
In the revised form I have no problem with it.
regards, tom lane
