Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Date
Msg-id 13725.1344980042@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Thu, Aug  4, 2011 at 09:00:11PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tor, 2011-08-04 at 14:44 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g'  -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
>>> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
>>> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.

>> I would be in favor of that.

> I have implemented this with the patch at:
>     http://momjian.us/expire/true_diff.txt

Does this really do anything for us that will justify the extra
back-patching pain it will cause?  I don't see that it's improving
code readability any.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: default_isolation_level='serializable' crashes on Windows
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false