Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree
Date
Msg-id 1371997528.55612.YahooMailNeo@web162903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> The git tree is at:
> git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/andresfreund/postgres.git branch
> xlog-decoding-rebasing-cf4
>
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=users/andresfreund/postgres.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/xlog-decoding-rebasing-cf4
>
> On 2013-06-15 00:48:17 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Overview of the attached patches:
>> 0001: indirect toast tuples; required but submitted independently
>> 0002: functions for testing; not required,
>> 0003: (tablespace, filenode) syscache; required
>> 0004: RelationMapFilenodeToOid: required, simple
>> 0005: pg_relation_by_filenode() function; not required but useful
>> 0006: Introduce InvalidCommandId: required, simple
>> 0007: Adjust Satisfies* interface: required, mechanical,
>> 0008: Allow walsender to attach to a database: required, needs review
>> 0009: New GetOldestXmin() parameter; required, pretty boring
>> 0010: Log xl_running_xact regularly in the bgwriter: required
>> 0011: make fsync_fname() public; required, needs to be in a different file
>> 0012: Relcache support for an Relation's primary key: required
>> 0013: Actual changeset extraction; required
>> 0014: Output plugin demo; not required (except for testing) but useful
>> 0015: Add pg_receivellog program: not required but useful
>> 0016: Add test_logical_decoding extension; not required, but contains
>>       the tests for the feature. Uses 0014
>> 0017: Snapshot building docs; not required
>
> Version v5-01 attached

Confirmed that all 17 patch files now apply cleanly, and that `make
check-world` builds cleanly after each patch in turn.

Reviewing and testing the final result now.  If that all looks
good, will submit a separate review of each patch.

Simon, do you want to do the final review and commit after I do
each piece?

--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: wrong state of patch in CF
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]