Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
>>> If we were a little earlier in the release cycle I would argue that
>>> if we're going to do anything with this column we should drop it.
>
>> Which is exactly what I think we should do as soon as we branch.
>
> If we're going to do that, there doesn't seem to me to be a lot of point
> in adjusting the column's contents in 9.3 --- the argument for doing
> that was mostly forward compatibility with some future actual usage of
> the column. I'd be more inclined to leave HEAD as-is and then do the
> column-ectomy along with this removal of dead code in 9.4.
ok
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
