Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> That doesn't mean this one isn't useful. Please revert this.
> Well, Tom and I thought it caused confusion, as did the person reporting
> the confusion. You saying to revert it isn't enough.
A possible compromise is to describe or show the syntax in some informal
form, so that it didn't look like one of the <synopsis> sections we use
for supported syntax. I'm not sure what that would look like exactly,
but I do see merit in both sides of this discussion...
regards, tom lane
