Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brett McCormick
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Date
Msg-id 13699.15991.447162.924830@web0.speakeasy.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state  (dg@illustra.com (David Gould))
List pgsql-hackers
I've been trying to use them in my patches as well, maily for
consistency as its something I'd never do myself.  I'll gladly
stop though.

On Sat, 13 June 1998, at 19:59:12, David Gould wrote:

> Ok, I won't add them. I'm not taking them out if I see them though ;-).
>
> > Sure, but braces don't help you either.  This is just as legal:
> >
> >     if (condition);
> >     {
> >         dosomething();
> >     }
>
> True enough, but I think less likely to happen.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Next
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state