Re: Outer join query plans and performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Outer join query plans and performance
Date
Msg-id 13679.1130249522@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Outer join query plans and performance  (Rich Doughty <rich@opusvl.com>)
Responses Re: Outer join query plans and performance
List pgsql-performance
Rich Doughty <rich@opusvl.com> writes:
> EXPLAIN SELECT *
> FROM
>      tokens.ta_tokens      t  LEFT JOIN
>      tokens.ta_tokenhist   h1 ON t.token_id = h1.token_id LEFT JOIN
>      tokens.ta_tokenhist   h2 ON t.token_id = h2.token_id
> WHERE
>      h1.histdate = 'now';

> EXPLAIN SELECT *
> FROM
>      tokens.ta_tokens      t  LEFT JOIN
>      tokens.ta_tokenhist   h1 ON t.token_id = h1.token_id LEFT JOIN
>      tokens.ta_tokenhist   h2 ON t.token_id = h2.token_id
> WHERE
>      h2.histdate = 'now';

The reason these are different is that the second case constrains only
the last-to-be-joined table, so the full cartesian product of t and h1
has to be formed.  If this wasn't what you had in mind, you might be
able to rearrange the order of the LEFT JOINs, but bear in mind that
in general, changing outer-join ordering changes the results.  (This
is why the planner won't fix it for you.)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: insertion of bytea
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Reindex - Is this necessary after a vacuum?