On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 14:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, this is not tolerable. We could think about improving the logic
> to have a stronger check on whether the old server is really there or
> not (ie it should be doing something more like pg_ping and less like
> just checking if the pidfile is there). But given how close we are to
> beta, maybe the best thing is to revert that change for now and put it
> back on the to-think-about-for-9.4 list. Peter?
Reverted.
