My prior comment simply answers your question. You likely can rewrite your
query so that a separate grouping layer is not needed (or rather the group
by would exist in the main query and you minimize the case/sub-select column
queries and use aggregates and case instead).
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pivot-query-with-count-tp5752072p5752078.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - sql mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
