On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 11:01 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
> I think we should first deal with using it for page checksums and if
> future versions want to reuse some of the code for WAL checksums then
> we can rearrange the code.
Sounds good to me, although I expect we at least want any assembly to be
in a separate file (if the specialization makes it in 9.3).
Regards,Jeff Davis
