Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> If we don't revert then what you pushed is clearly necessary, so
> no objection to having done that. I'll look at the larger
> situation as soon as I get a chance.
Any objections to my pushing the patch I posted Friday to draw a
distinction between populated and scannable, which also attempted
to address a couple points raised by you, or would you rather the
code didn't change at the moment?
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
