Re: INDEX Performance Issue - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: INDEX Performance Issue
Date
Msg-id 1365347742.50505.YahooMailNeo@web162901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INDEX Performance Issue  (Greg Williamson <gwilliamson39@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: INDEX Performance Issue
List pgsql-performance
Greg Williamson <gwilliamson39@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> Thanks for your response. I tried doing what you suggested so
>> that table now has a primary key of
>> ' CONSTRAINT data_area_pkey PRIMARY KEY(area_id , data_id ); '
>> and I've added the INDEX of
>> 'CREATE INDEX data_area_data_id_index ON data_area USING btree (data_id );'

Yeah, that is what I was suggesting.

>> unfortunately it hasn't resulted in an improvement of the query
>> performance.

> Did you run analyze on the table after creating the index ?

That probably isn't necessary.  Statistics are normally on relations
and columns; there are only certain special cases where an ANALYZE
is needed after an index build, like if the index is on an
expression rather than a list of columns.

Mark, what happens if you change that left join to a normal (inner)
join?  Since you're doing an inner join to data_area and that has a
foreign key to area, there should always be a match anyway, right?
The optimizer doesn't recognize that, so it can't start from the
area and just match to the appropriate points.

--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Franck Routier
Date:
Subject: Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ?
Next
From: Mark Davidson
Date:
Subject: Re: INDEX Performance Issue