Re: psql - -dry-run option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: psql - -dry-run option
Date
Msg-id 13653.1450379035@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to psql - -dry-run option  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: psql - -dry-run option
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> when I read a blog
> http://www.depesz.com/2015/12/14/waiting-for-9-6-psql-support-multiple-c-and-f-options-and-allow-mixing-them/
> where is emulated dry-run mode, I though so we can implement it very
> simply.

Not one that is actually reliable.  All a script would have to do is
include its own begin/commit commands, and it would override what you
are talking about.  It's okay, in my opinion, if the -1 switch is just a
half-baked "best effort" solution.  It's not okay to provide a --dry-run
switch that is equally full of holes, because if someone were to actually
rely on it to not execute the script, the possibility of an override would
amount to a security bug.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: psql - -dry-run option