Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> My opinion is that we don't need to be perfect as long as we
> catch 99% of random errors and we don't have any major blind
> spots.
+1
> Also, the first version doesn't necessarily need to perform well;
> we can leave optimization as future work.
+1, as long as we don't slow down instances not using the feature,
and we don't paint ourselves into a corner.
> We're not really trying to catch memory errors anyway.
+1
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
