On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 21:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I can't escape the feeling that we'd just be reinventing software RAID.
> There's no reason to think that we can deal with this class of problems
> better than the storage system can.
The goal would be to reliably detect a situation where WAL that has been
flushed successfully was later corrupted; not necessarily to recover
when we find it. Unless it's something like ZFS, I don't think most
software RAID will reliably detect corruption.
A side benefit is that it would also help catch bugs like this in the
future.
I'm not advocating for this particular solution, but I do concur with
Jeff Janes that it's a little bit scary and that we can entertain some
ideas about how to mitigate it.
Regards,Jeff Davis
