Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:28:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, I thought about that too after sending my message. This version
>> LGTM, although maybe the comment could be slightly more verbose with
>> explicit reference to Inf/NaN as being the cases we need to quote.
> Done.
This version works for me.
regards, tom lane