Re: [HACKERS] CVSup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brett McCormick
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CVSup
Date
Msg-id 13641.28506.987413.25521@abraxas.scene.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to CVSup  ("Maurice Gittens" <mgittens@gits.nl>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] CVSup  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
This may be the totally wrong place for asking this question, but what
exactly *is* CVSup?

On Fri, 1 May 1998, at 08:36:05, Maurice Gittens wrote:

> I don't understand the problem CVSup is intended to solve given
> that CVS allows remote access to the repository using standard cvs
> commands. Is there a specific reason why we can't/don't have readonly access
> to the postgresql repository?
>
> I think it's neat to be able to use commands like "cvs diff" etc. However
> I really hate it that my changes seem to get overwritten why I using
> CVSup since this doesn't happen when using the "cvs update".
>
> Can anyone explain why this is the way it is?
>
> Thanks, with regards from Maurice.
>
>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Maurice Gittens"
Date:
Subject: CVSup
Next
From: Peter Mount
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: CODE ANALYSIS FOR (an apparent error in answer from "##" (closest proximity)operator)