Re: Using of --data-checksums - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Using of --data-checksums
Date
Msg-id 13634.1586701404@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using of --data-checksums  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Using of --data-checksums
Re: Using of --data-checksums
Re: Using of --data-checksums
List pgsql-general
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> And FWIW, I do think we should change the default. And maybe spend some
> extra effort on the message coming out of pg_upgrade in this case to make
> it clear to people what their options are and exactly what to do.

Is there any hard evidence of checksums catching problems at all?
Let alone in sufficient number to make them be on-by-default?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Using of --data-checksums
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Which commands are guaranteed to drop role