Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Improving the ngettext() patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Improving the ngettext() patch
Date
Msg-id 13626.1244125288@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving the ngettext() patch  (pg@thetdh.com)
Responses Re: Improving the ngettext() patch  (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
pg@thetdh.com writes:
>> Russian plural forms for 100, 101, 102 etc. is different, as for 0, 1, 2.

> True. The rule IIRC is that except for 11-14 and for collective numerals, declination follows the last digit.

Wow.  So how does anyone represent that in the .po files?  AFAICT the
notation the gettext machinery provides isn't really powerful enough
for this.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?
Next
From: Gevik Babakhani
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about FUNCDETAIL_MULTIPLE