Re: pg_xlogdump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_xlogdump
Date
Msg-id 1361834056.819.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_xlogdump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_xlogdump
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 09:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I independently wonder whether we should remove the PGXS stub from
> > xlogdump, given it relies on a full sourcetree available?
> 
> I'd just as soon keep its Makefile looking like all the others.
> 
If the code doesn't actually work, it should be deleted.  There is no
value in keeping the Makefile looking like the others, because it
doesn't in fact look like the others.

I for one wonder why we even have PGXS support in contrib at all.  It's
not documented or tested anywhere, so it might as well not exist.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: json generation enhancements
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pg_xlogdump compiler warning