Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id 1361456750.11476.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 2/20/13 11:14 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
>> That's not entirely true. From the database's point of view,
>> TRUNCATE is in many ways actually DDL.
>
> Whether something is DDL or DML or a read operation (query) is
> not an implementation detail, it's a user-exposed category.
> Since TRUNCATE is logically equivalent to DELETE, it's a DML
> operation, as far as the user is concerned.

Not really.  It doesn't follow the same MVCC behavior as DML.  This
is user-visible, documented behavior.

--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Albe Laurenz
Date:
Subject: Re: FDW for PostgreSQL
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: FDW for PostgreSQL