Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I can't imagine that anybody with a large database ran pg
> successfully with a small freeze_min_age due to this.
I can't speak to this from personal experience, because at
Wisconsin Courts we found ourselves best served by running a
database VACUUM FREEZE ANALYZE each night during off-peak hours.
> It seems to be broken since the initial introduction of
> freeze_table_age in 6587818542e79012276dcfedb2f97e3522ee5e9b.
> Trivial patch attached.
I didn't see a patch attached.
-Kevin
