Re: recovery.conf parsing problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: recovery.conf parsing problems
Date
Msg-id 13584.1166056482@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: recovery.conf parsing problems  (Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com> writes:
> That only helps if you can trust %p not to contain whitespace or $. If it
> is always relative to somewhere in the data dir then this is probably ok,
> but if it's an absolute path then you can't assume that.

It is relative, so I think this is actually not a problem.  Still, we
ought to make the lexical structure the same as it is in postgresql.conf.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Operator class group proposal
Next
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_standby and build farm