Re: bad examples in pg_dump README - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: bad examples in pg_dump README
Date
Msg-id 1358398351.21499.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bad examples in pg_dump README  (Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 19:55 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 15:34 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I propose slimming down the pg_dump README, keeping intact the
> >> > introductory notes and details of the tar format.
> >>
> >> Do we need to keep it at all, really? Certainly the introductory part
> >> is covered in the main documentation already...
> >
> > I'd remove it and distribute the remaining information, if any, between
> > the source code and the man page.
> 
> Here's a patch to do so. After removing the discussed bogus
> information, there were only two notes which I still found relevant,
> so I stuck those in the appropriate header comments.

Committed.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4