Re: bad examples in pg_dump README - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: bad examples in pg_dump README
Date
Msg-id 1357614742.19347.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bad examples in pg_dump README  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: bad examples in pg_dump README
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 15:34 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I propose slimming down the pg_dump README, keeping intact the
> > introductory notes and details of the tar format.
> 
> Do we need to keep it at all, really? Certainly the introductory part
> is covered in the main documentation already...

I'd remove it and distribute the remaining information, if any, between
the source code and the man page.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: PL/Python result object str handler
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch to fix missing libecpg_compat.lib and libpgtypes.lib.