Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 07:37:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This of course arises because the source code is passing the address
>> of a local ErrorSaveContext variable to that macro. We don't have
>> any other instances of that coding pattern AFAICS, so I wonder if
>> that was really the most adapted way to do it.
> Thanks for the report. Right. There are three instances of that in
> pg_dependencies.c, two in pg_ndistinct.c. I would not mind doing the
> attached to calm down these warnings, matching with the other areas of
> the code, that simply removes the macro and checks the state value
> directly.
Ah, right, now that you mention it, 56b1e88c8 did this same fix
before. This way is fine with me.
I didn't review the error message changes closely. I do wonder if
some of them are can't-happen cases that could just use an elog()
instead of a translatable message.
regards, tom lane
