Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
Date
Msg-id 13490.1117634713@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> If I/O is a problem, then surely you will agree that PreAllocXLog is
> still required and should not be run by a backend?

It is still required, but it isn't run by backends --- it's fired off
during checkpoints.  I think there was some discussion recently about
making it more aggressive about allocating future segments; which
strikes me as a good idea.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Next
From: Jochem van Dieten
Date:
Subject: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?