Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of lun sep 24 05:26:52 -0300 201=
2:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> > Agreed. Quite aside from backwards-compatibility concerns, I think t=
hat
> > trying to avoid multiple dependency paths is doomed to failure.
>=20
> For a =E2=80=9CDIRTT=E2=80=9D approach to the problems, I think =C3=81l=
varo's work is in the
> right direction, and should be pursued without trying to address the
> back branches too. I don't remember now if his tracking attempt was als=
o
> trying to change pg_depend entries, I think that was in two separate
> patches versions.
Yes, those were different patches.
> =C3=81lvaro, do you want to be working on a master only version of the =
fix
> or do you want me to?
Please go ahead :-)
--=20
=C3=81lvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
