Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4 - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers
From | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1348408636.11977.15.camel@localhost.localdomain Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4 (Erwin Brandstetter <brandstetter@falter.at>) |
List | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 05:19 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote: > On 11.09.2012 19:41, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 02:04 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote: > >> On 05.09.2012 23:12, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 23:55 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 16:57 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote: > >>>>> On 27.08.2012 16:37, Erwin Brandstetter wrote: > >>>>>> Aloha! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think I ran into this regression with v1.16 beta4 and filed a ticket. > >>>>>> So far I have seen this to affect indexes, primary keys and foreign keys > >>>>>> But *not* tables, views, function, triggers, sequences or types ... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Added two small screenshots to the ticket to compare 1.4 and 1.16b4 > >>>>>> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/377 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards > >>>>>> Erwin > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> I tried to add more details to the ticket, buthttp://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ decided to answer with error messages.. seems to be offline for now? > >>>>> I'll add my findings here: > >>>>> > >>>>> Also seems to affect foreign keys and unique indexes. > >>>>> But *not* tables, views, function, triggers, sequences or types ... > >>>>> Tested with PostgreSQL 9.1 and 8.4 > >>>>> > >>>>> However, in seemingly arbitrary rare cases it works as it should. It's always the same for all objects under onetable so far. I tried but failed to > >>>>> spot a difference between the involved tables. > >>>>> > >>>> As you said, the trac site seems to be done right now, so I can't check > >>>> your screenshots. I know there are some issues with the indexes right > >>>> now. See the thread intitled "pgAdmin III commit: Lots of work on > >>>> domains, and check constraints". I have a patch that may fix your > >>>> issues, but can't check as I can't see your screenshots. I mostly need > >>>> an answer from Dave, to know if I should apply my patch, or revert my > >>>> older patch. > >>>> > >>> trac is available now, thanks to Dave. > >>> > >>> My patch fixes the issue you found. > >> I have downloaded and tested with 1.16.0 (Sep 7 2012). I am afraid my results disagree, the regression is still there,all of it. Just like in the > >> screenshot in the ticket. > >> > >> The other thing I reported seems fixed, though: "Bug in SQL script for indexes", where the SQL script used the tablename instead of the schema name. > >> > > Then you should try to give me an SQL script that I can execute and that > > will show the same issue. Because I tried again, and I don't have the > > issue. > > It affects 9 out of 10 tables here. Just like the screenshots > demonstrate. Items are missing from the context menu and the DEL key is > not working. > I have tried again an to find anything that would bind the rare cases > where it works normally together, but no luck. > If I recreate the table in another schema it stops to work. > If I restart pgAdmin, the same tables exhibit normal behavior, so it's > not totaly random. > pgAdmin 1.14.3 does not display the problem. > > I fail to see how I could provide an SQL script. > Maybe it's specific to Windows (XP)? I fail to see how it could be specific to Windows. Apart from a wxWidgets bug. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com
pgadmin-hackers by date: