Newbie performance problem - semop taking most of time ? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From mal.oracledba
Subject Newbie performance problem - semop taking most of time ?
Date
Msg-id 1348058099977-5724566.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Newbie performance problem - semop taking most of time ?
List pgsql-performance
Using postgreSQL 9.2 with the following settings:

max_connections = 1000                  # (change requires restart)
shared_buffers = 65536MB                # min 128kB
work_mem = 16MB                         # min 64kB
effective_io_concurrency = 48           # 1-1000; 0 disables prefetching
wal_buffers = 16MB                      # min 32kB, -1 sets based on
shared_buffers
commit_delay = 10000                    # range 0-100000, in microseconds
commit_siblings = 100                   # range 1-1000
checkpoint_segments = 256               # in logfile segments, min 1, 16MB
each
checkpoint_timeout = 10min              # range 30s-1h
checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9      # checkpoint target duration, 0.0 -
1.0
effective_cache_size = 65536MB

Server spec is Xeon 8 Core/16threads, 512Gb memory. Database size is 100G.
Underlying SAN is raid 1/0.
OS is Linux Redhat 6.2. Kernel 2.6.32

Running hammer ora TPC-C type load. Under 20 user load (no key and think)
getting approx 180,000 TPM - which is about half of what I get with another
database vendor.

tracing the process (strace -r) I get outtput like that below - a lot of the
time seems to be doing semop type operations (eg 0.001299 semop(13369414,
{{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0)

Just wondered if anyone could tell me what is going on there and any
possibilities that I might have to decrease this wait time ?


     0.000176 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000031 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.001102 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000049 semop(13369414, {{4, 1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000405 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000049 semop(13369414, {{10, 1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000337 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000057 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000074 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000779 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000847 sendto(10,
"T\0\0\0\37\0\1neword\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\6\244\377\377\377\377\377\377\0\0"...,
63, 0, NULL, 0) = 63
     0.000063 recvfrom(10, "Q\0\0\0(select neword(142,1001,8,23"..., 8192,
0, NULL, NULL) = 41
     0.000463 lseek(12, 0, SEEK_END)    = 52486144
     0.000057 lseek(13, 0, SEEK_END)    = 6356992
     0.001299 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000864 semop(13402183, {{2, 1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000420 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000675 semop(13402183, {{7, 1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000445 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.000156 semop(13369414, {{3, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
     0.001458 semop(13369414, {{6, 1, 0}}, 1) = 0

Cheers,

Mal





--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Newbie-performance-problem-semop-taking-most-of-time-tp5724566.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Brandon
Date:
Subject: Query Planner Optimization?
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL performance on 64 bit as compared to 32 bit