Re: splitting htup.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: splitting htup.h
Date
Msg-id 1346255607-sup-9799@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: splitting htup.h  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: splitting htup.h
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mié ago 29 11:32:04 -0400 2012:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ago 28 17:27:51 -0400 2012:

> > This should
> > reduce the number of changes needed, not only in our code but third
> > party code.  Not sure if the new file could sanely be called
> > "htup_private.h"; it seems a bit widely used for that.  Maybe "heap.h"?
>
> Not sure I really like heap.h, but let's put that aside for a moment.

... we already have catalog/heap.h, so that would be one reason to avoid
that name.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: splitting htup.h
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: splitting htup.h