Re: size of .po changesets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: size of .po changesets
Date
Msg-id 1345779405.9270.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to size of .po changesets  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 11:21 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Yeah, IMHO .po files are handled pretty badly by SCMs.

By SCMs that store diffs internally, perhaps, but Git doesn't, so I
don't think it matters much for storage whether .po files diff well.

> I wonder if we
> could reduce the amount of git churn caused by those files by simply
> removing all comment lines from these files as they are exported from
> pgtranslation into postgresql.git?  Since they are not "source" for
> postgresql.git anyway, the other one being the canonical repository,
> there doesn't seem to be any point to those lines ... or am I mistaken?

I don't see this being worth the trouble.  It would just make it more
difficult to track where the files are coming from.  There could also be
problems with downstream distributors if we are not shipping files in
source form.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does analyze_new_cluster.sh use sleep?
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation