Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie ago 03 09:59:36 -0400 2012:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:26:56AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The concurrent index documentation under discussion above was never
> > updated, so I took a stab at it, attached.
> >
> > Greg, I looked at adding a mention of the virtual transaction wait to
> > the "explicit-locking" section as you suggested, and found those were
> > all user-visible locking, while this is internal locking. I did find a
> > clear description of transaction id locking in the pg_locks system view
> > docs, so I just referenced that.
>
> I found a way to clarify the wording further; patch attached.
Looks sane to me.
Are we backpatching this to 9.1? I no longer remember if the original
wording is there or just in 9.2.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
