Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Date
Msg-id 13424.1117634333@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Sorry to followup to my own message, but it occurs to me that COPY could be
> made to automatically do this for the case of an empty destination table too.

Not unless you are proposing to change COPY to acquire a lock strong
enough to lock out other writers to the table for the duration ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Physical Tlist optimization still possible?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?