On lör, 2012-06-23 at 23:08 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> I spotted a couple of other issues during testing:
>
> * You're still allowing INCLUDING DEFAULTS and INCLUDING STORAGE, even
> though these options are not supported on foreign tables.
>
> * If I do INCLUDING ALL, I get an error because of the unsupported
> options. I think that "ALL" in this context needs to be made to mean
> all the options that foreign tables support (just COMMENTS at the
> moment).
Note that when I added CREATE TABLE LIKE to support composite types, it
was decided to ignore non-applicable options (like copying indexes from
types or views etc.). The same should be done here, unless we have
reasons to revise the earlier decision.
