Re: BUG #6729: Install of postgresql-devel for x86_84 and i686 fails - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Subject Re: BUG #6729: Install of postgresql-devel for x86_84 and i686 fails
Date
Msg-id 1342125776.18166.32.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #6729: Install of postgresql-devel for x86_84 and i686 fails  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #6729: Install of postgresql-devel for x86_84 and i686 fails  (Yogesh_Sharma@Cymer.com)
List pgsql-bugs
Hi,

On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 16:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> writes:
> > It is not a bug, but it might be a missing feature (and I'm not sure
> how
> > to fix it :-) )
>
> It's fairly common for -devel packages of different architectures to
> conflict.  If you were to try to fix it, you'd likely need the 64-bit
> versions to install their stuff into .../lib64/ not .../lib/.

Well, there lies the problem. My packages push everything
under /usr/pgsql-9.1 , and libs go to /usr/pgsql-9.1/lib. A

> Not sure how practical such a change is at this late date.

What if I build *9.2* with --libdir=/usr/pgsql-9.1/lib64 for x86_64, and
then push 32-bit packages to /usr/pgsql-9.1/lib ?

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #6729: Install of postgresql-devel for x86_84 and i686 fails
Next
From: mfwilson@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: BUG #6733: All Tables Empty After pg_upgrade (PG 9.2.0 beta 2)