Re: Schema version management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Schema version management
Date
Msg-id 1341956349.14340.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Schema version management  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Schema version management  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Schema version management  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2012-07-08 at 18:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > On lör, 2012-07-07 at 17:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Sure.  You need not look further than "/" to find an operator name
> that
> >> absolutely *will* cause trouble if it's dumped into a filename
> >> literally.
> 
> > But that problem applies to all object names.
> 
> In principle, yes, but in practice it's far more likely that operators
> will have names requiring some sort of encoding than that objects with
> SQL-identifier names will.

I'm not sure.  The only character that's certainly an issue is "/".  Are
there any others on file systems that we want to support?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous Standalone Master Redoux